In the United States, the tradition of political protest and organized outrage has passed from generation to generation. As the older generations settle into more conventional means of political engagement, young people attempt to make their voices heard, though they are disenfranchised. This year, youth political activism has been hyperfocused on the midterm elections, attempting to get millennials and older Generation Z-ers out to vote. To truly understand how this election has played out across generations, it is imperative to look at youth activism: its present, its past and its future.

Youth activism has become somewhat of an American tradition, going back as far as the 19th Century, when newsboys for the New York World went on strike. Fifty years later, a case precipitated by a youth-led school walkout made it all the way to the Supreme Court, eventually being combined with the landmark Brown v. Board of Education decision. A youth activist also refused to give up her seat on a bus in the South, a move which inspired Rosa Parks’ activism.

In the 1960s, young activists participated in the march from Selma to Montgomery to end the suppression of Black voters. College students also catalyzed the famous Woolworth lunch counter sit-ins. A student named Mary Beth Tinker, by refusing to take off her black armband, took a case to the Supreme Court which assured students that they do not shed their rights at the schoolhouse gate.

In 1970, college students protesting the Vietnam War were killed at Kent State University in Ohio in a decade marked by protests and anti-war activism. In the 70s, 80s and early 90s, college students catalyzed the movement to divest from Apartheid, a movement which helped bring an end to legal discrimination in South Africa. 

However, these generations have lost their political spark. Older generations which once led progressive charges now tend to hold more conservative viewpoints, according to Pew Research Center. These viewpoints also appear in considering protests, as shown in this passage from the Washington Post:

Among adults ages 50 and older, 63 percent say kneeling during the national anthem is never appropriate, compared with 50 percent among those ages 30-49 and 38 percent of people ages 18-29. Among this youngest group, a 57 percent majority say anthem protests are appropriate.

Now, in 2018, youth activists are taking the charge on racial equality through Black Lives Matter, and on gun violence in the Never Again Movement, which was founded by students in the aftermath of a school shooting in Parkland, Fla. Their current goal? Get young people to vote in 2018.

At Cherry Hill East, the school’s chapter of Never Again held a meeting to make signs aimed at persuading seniors and teachers to vote. One such sign, made by Sophia Szenitas (‘19), read “your voice is your vote.”

“Historically, [millennial and Generation Z] turnout has been terribly low, but right now, we have the power and we have the numbers to create substantial change in this country,” said Madeliene Armstrong (‘20), president of Never Again CHE. For those who cannot vote, Armstrong recommends holding voter registration drives, canvassing and volunteering on political campaigns.

“It’s enlightening to remember that we can make progress with every coming day,” said Armstrong.

One would have thought there was a treasure trove in the back of the library at Cherry Hill East the day of the Kavanaugh hearings, but in fact, it was just a TV playing CNN. Generation Z’s relationship with media has drastically changed this election. No longer does America’s youngest generation crowd around a TV in anticipation of the 6 p.m. news, now, news articles and videos are being consumed in classrooms, lunchrooms and the library at the touch of a button or click of a remote.

First, some statistics: a whopping 95 percent of teens have access to a smartphone, according to a Pew Reseach Poll meaning that news alerts can reach a vast majority of Generation Z teens. In that same poll, 16 percent of teens who reported that social media was a positive influence on their life said that they used social media mostly for news. This social media presence has influenced the midterm elections. Celebrities such as Taylor Swift have utilized social media to get out the vote.

“

I think the greatest difference between our generation and others is the way in which we are getting our news. We are the generation that lived with the internet at our fingertips. Cellphones… computers… internet technology, it’s all available to us for pretty much all of our lives. So with all of that information available to us constantly, our nation has the ability to be one of the most educated generations going into elections. We can very easily read about all of the candidates and all the current issues. But the one issue is that social media will feed you whatever you like. Facebook has this issue. Facebook and Twitter will feedback whatever you like. If you only like far-left or far-right articles, they will only feed you far-right or far-left articles. No one is being exposed to different perspectives. This is only building on the polarization. This is not reliable for those looking to actually be informed on the news. Part of our responsibility is to be informed on both sides.

— Julia Langmuir (Cherry Hill East Board of Education Representative)